Implements Phases 1-8 of the TFTSR implementation plan. Rust backend (Tauri 2.x, src-tauri/): - Multi-provider AI: OpenAI-compatible, Anthropic, Gemini, Mistral, Ollama - PII detection engine: 11 regex patterns with overlap resolution - SQLCipher AES-256 encrypted database with 10 versioned migrations - 28 Tauri IPC commands for triage, analysis, document, and system ops - Ollama: hardware probe, model recommendations, pull/delete with events - RCA and blameless post-mortem Markdown document generators - PDF export via printpdf - Audit log: SHA-256 hash of every external data send - Integration stubs for Confluence, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps (v0.2) Frontend (React 18 + TypeScript + Vite, src/): - 9 pages: full triage workflow NewIssue→LogUpload→Triage→Resolution→RCA→Postmortem→History+Settings - 7 components: ChatWindow, TriageProgress, PiiDiffViewer, DocEditor, HardwareReport, ModelSelector, UI primitives - 3 Zustand stores: session, settings (persisted), history - Type-safe tauriCommands.ts matching Rust backend types exactly - 8 IT domain system prompts (Linux, Windows, Network, K8s, DB, Virt, HW, Obs) DevOps: - .woodpecker/test.yml: rustfmt, clippy, cargo test, tsc, vitest on every push - .woodpecker/release.yml: linux/amd64 + linux/arm64 builds, Gogs release upload Verified: - cargo check: zero errors - tsc --noEmit: zero errors - vitest run: 13/13 unit tests passing Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
85 lines
3.4 KiB
JavaScript
85 lines
3.4 KiB
JavaScript
"use strict";
|
|
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
|
|
exports.cookieCompare = cookieCompare;
|
|
/**
|
|
* The maximum timestamp a cookie, in milliseconds. The value is (2^31 - 1) seconds since the Unix
|
|
* epoch, corresponding to 2038-01-19.
|
|
*/
|
|
const MAX_TIME = 2147483647000;
|
|
/**
|
|
* A comparison function that can be used with {@link https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/sort | Array.sort()},
|
|
* which orders a list of cookies into the recommended order given in Step 2 of {@link https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6265.html#section-5.4 | RFC6265 - Section 5.4}.
|
|
*
|
|
* The sort algorithm is, in order of precedence:
|
|
*
|
|
* - Longest {@link Cookie.path}
|
|
*
|
|
* - Oldest {@link Cookie.creation} (which has a 1-ms precision, same as Date)
|
|
*
|
|
* - Lowest {@link Cookie.creationIndex} (to get beyond the 1-ms precision)
|
|
*
|
|
* @remarks
|
|
* ### RFC6265 - Section 5.4 - Step 2
|
|
*
|
|
* The user agent SHOULD sort the cookie-list in the following order:
|
|
*
|
|
* - Cookies with longer paths are listed before cookies with shorter paths.
|
|
*
|
|
* - Among cookies that have equal-length path fields, cookies with
|
|
* earlier creation-times are listed before cookies with later
|
|
* creation-times.
|
|
*
|
|
* NOTE: Not all user agents sort the cookie-list in this order, but
|
|
* this order reflects common practice when this document was
|
|
* written, and, historically, there have been servers that
|
|
* (erroneously) depended on this order.
|
|
*
|
|
* ### Custom Store Implementors
|
|
*
|
|
* Since the JavaScript Date is limited to a 1-ms precision, cookies within the same millisecond are entirely possible.
|
|
* This is especially true when using the `now` option to `CookieJar.setCookie(...)`. The {@link Cookie.creationIndex}
|
|
* property is a per-process global counter, assigned during construction with `new Cookie()`, which preserves the spirit
|
|
* of the RFC sorting: older cookies go first. This works great for {@link MemoryCookieStore} since `Set-Cookie` headers
|
|
* are parsed in order, but is not so great for distributed systems.
|
|
*
|
|
* Sophisticated Stores may wish to set this to some other
|
|
* logical clock so that if cookies `A` and `B` are created in the same millisecond, but cookie `A` is created before
|
|
* cookie `B`, then `A.creationIndex < B.creationIndex`.
|
|
*
|
|
* @example
|
|
* ```
|
|
* const cookies = [
|
|
* new Cookie({ key: 'a', value: '' }),
|
|
* new Cookie({ key: 'b', value: '' }),
|
|
* new Cookie({ key: 'c', value: '', path: '/path' }),
|
|
* new Cookie({ key: 'd', value: '', path: '/path' }),
|
|
* ]
|
|
* cookies.sort(cookieCompare)
|
|
* // cookie sort order would be ['c', 'd', 'a', 'b']
|
|
* ```
|
|
*
|
|
* @param a - the first Cookie for comparison
|
|
* @param b - the second Cookie for comparison
|
|
* @public
|
|
*/
|
|
function cookieCompare(a, b) {
|
|
let cmp;
|
|
// descending for length: b CMP a
|
|
const aPathLen = a.path ? a.path.length : 0;
|
|
const bPathLen = b.path ? b.path.length : 0;
|
|
cmp = bPathLen - aPathLen;
|
|
if (cmp !== 0) {
|
|
return cmp;
|
|
}
|
|
// ascending for time: a CMP b
|
|
const aTime = a.creation && a.creation instanceof Date ? a.creation.getTime() : MAX_TIME;
|
|
const bTime = b.creation && b.creation instanceof Date ? b.creation.getTime() : MAX_TIME;
|
|
cmp = aTime - bTime;
|
|
if (cmp !== 0) {
|
|
return cmp;
|
|
}
|
|
// break ties for the same millisecond (precision of JavaScript's clock)
|
|
cmp = (a.creationIndex || 0) - (b.creationIndex || 0);
|
|
return cmp;
|
|
}
|